| | | | | | |

Engineering Sample 906ED 2.1GHz vs Ryzen 9 7940HS


Description
The 906ED 2.1GHz is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 906ED 2.1GHz gets a score of 657.2 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.1 times faster than the 906ED 2.1GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a70f41
Core
Comet Lake-H
Phoenix
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
- W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2020
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
86.65k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
657.19k points
718.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
906ED 2.1GHz
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
33.92k
38.25k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
30k
29.92k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
15.5k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
29.89k (x1.9)
TOTAL
86.65k
113.57k (x1.31)

Multithread

906ED 2.1GHz

7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
302.78k
309.6k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
278.98k
260.4k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.89k
128.56k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
20.04k (x2.66)
TOTAL
657.19k
718.59k (x1.09)

Performance/W
906ED 2.1GHz
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)