Engineering Sample 90671 vs Core i5-10400F
Description
The 90671 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 90671 gets a score of 878.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 90671 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 90671 gets a score of 878.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 90671 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90671
a0655
Core
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
-/24
6/12
TDP
- W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
- kB
16386 kB
Date
-
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
78.13k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
878.58k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
90671
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
35.2k
28.39k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.12k
24.89k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.42k
5.78k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.39k
13.19k (x1.57)
TOTAL
78.13k
72.25k (x0.92)
Multithread
90671
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
391.05k
180.2k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
331.85k
163.51k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
139.66k
40.6k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.02k
6.48k (x0.4)
TOTAL
878.58k
390.78k (x0.44)
Performance/W
90671
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)