Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs N95
Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the gets 114.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the gets 114.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
b06e0
Core
Kaby Lake
Gracemont
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
- W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
42.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
114.15k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
15.92k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
12.43k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
6.52k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
7.54k (x0.73)
TOTAL
58.05k
42.41k (x0.73)
Multithread
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
50.11k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
37.68k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
21.02k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
5.34k (x0.93)
TOTAL
210.91k
114.15k (x0.54)
Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)