Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs 906A0
Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 906A0 is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the 906A0 gets 624.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906A0 is 3 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the 906A0 gets 624.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906A0 is 3 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
906a0
Core
Kaby Lake
-
Base frecuency
3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
-
Cores/Threads
4/8
14/20
TDP
- W
W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
- kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
- kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
- kB
Date
June 2016
-
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
75.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
624.22k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
906A0
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
34.86k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
23.1k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
9.49k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
7.84k (x0.75)
TOTAL
58.05k
75.3k (x1.3)
Multithread
506E8 3GHz
906A0
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
289.68k (x3.13)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
222.53k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
106.11k (x4.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
5.9k (x1.03)
TOTAL
210.91k
624.22k (x2.96)
Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
906A0
Test#1 (Integers)