| | | | | | |

Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz vs Core i3-1125G4


Description
The 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 3GHz gets a score of 210.9 k points while the i3-1125G4 gets 241 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e8
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
- W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2016
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
58.05k points
56.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.91k points
241.03k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
22.63k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
20.45k
17.36k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
8.89k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.39k
7.37k (x0.71)
TOTAL
58.05k
56.25k (x0.97)

Multithread

506E8 3GHz

i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
92.69k
103.42k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
90.45k
102.39k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.02k
32.17k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.75k
3.05k (x0.53)
TOTAL
210.91k
241.03k (x1.14)

Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)