Engineering Sample 506E8 vs N95
Description
The 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 2.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 2.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
b06e0
Core
Kaby Lake
Gracemont
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
- W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
56.39k points
37.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
211.6k points
97.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
23.91k
14.82k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
21.03k
10.51k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
5.45k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
6.27k (x0.98)
TOTAL
56.39k
37.06k (x0.66)
Multithread
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
95.3k
43.01k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
91.94k
32.29k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.06k
17.36k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.3k
4.82k (x2.1)
TOTAL
211.6k
97.48k (x0.46)
Performance/W
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)