Core i7-11800H (ES) vs Engineering Sample 906A0
Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 906A0 is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 655.1 k points while the 906A0 gets 624.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1 times faster than the 906A0. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 655.1 k points while the 906A0 gets 624.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1 times faster than the 906A0. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d0
906a0
Core
Tiger Lake-H
-
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
-
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
45 W
W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
- kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
- kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
- kB
Date
May 2021
-
Mean monothread perf.
79.83k points
75.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
655.12k points
624.22k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
906A0
Test#1 (Integers)
30.93k
34.86k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
29.93k
23.1k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.25k
9.49k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.73k
7.84k (x0.67)
TOTAL
79.83k
75.3k (x0.94)
Multithread
i7-11800H (ES)
906A0
Test#1 (Integers)
278.39k
289.68k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
290.74k
222.53k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.94k
106.11k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.06k
5.9k (x0.28)
TOTAL
655.12k
624.22k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
906A0
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/W