Engineering Sample 906A0 vs Core i7-11800H (ES)
Description
The 906A0 is based on - architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 906A0 gets a score of 624.2 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 655.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1 times faster than the 906A0. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 906A0 gets a score of 624.2 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 655.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1 times faster than the 906A0. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a0
806d0
Core
-
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
4.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
-
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
14/20
8/16
TDP
W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
- kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
- kB
24576 kB
Date
-
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
75.3k points
79.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
624.22k points
655.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
906A0
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
34.86k
30.93k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
23.1k
29.93k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.49k
7.25k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.84k
11.73k (x1.5)
TOTAL
75.3k
79.83k (x1.06)
Multithread
906A0
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
289.68k
278.39k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
222.53k
290.74k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106.11k
64.94k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
21.06k (x3.57)
TOTAL
624.22k
655.12k (x1.05)
Performance/W
906A0
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)