| | | | | | |

Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
306f2
Core
Phoenix
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
30 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
June 2023
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
452.9k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
18.62k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
10.49k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
4.04k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
3.26k (x0.12)
TOTAL
101.73k
36.41k (x0.36)

Multithread

Z1 Extreme

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
236.25k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
151.05k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
58.9k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
6.7k (x0.59)
TOTAL
553.41k
452.9k (x0.82)

Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4