Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Core i7-7560U
Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 5.7 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 5.7 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
806e9
Core
Phoenix
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
30 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2023
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
97.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
19.37k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
17.26k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
3.78k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
7.75k (x0.28)
TOTAL
101.73k
48.16k (x0.47)
Multithread
Z1 Extreme
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
39.17k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
38.24k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
8.9k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
10.97k (x0.97)
TOTAL
553.41k
97.27k (x0.18)
Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
6485 points/W
Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4