| | | | | | |

Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Core i7-10870H


Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
a0652
Core
Phoenix
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
30 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
June 2023
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
487.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
30.38k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
27.95k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
6.51k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
14.37k (x0.52)
TOTAL
101.73k
79.2k (x0.78)

Multithread

Z1 Extreme

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
216.18k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
210.82k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
51.57k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
8.47k (x0.75)
TOTAL
553.41k
487.05k (x0.88)

Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4