Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Core i7-10700
Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
a0655
Core
Phoenix
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
30 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
June 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
537.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
30.66k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
25.64k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
5.98k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
12.25k (x0.45)
TOTAL
101.73k
74.53k (x0.73)
Multithread
Z1 Extreme
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
240.28k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
234.3k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
56.12k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
7.02k (x0.62)
TOTAL
553.41k
537.73k (x0.97)
Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
8273 points/W
Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4