| | | | | | |

Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Core i3-8350K


Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 2.3 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
906eb
Core
Phoenix
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
30 W
91 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2023
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
68.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
237.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
27.29k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
24.19k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
5.75k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
11.13k (x0.41)
TOTAL
101.73k
68.36k (x0.67)

Multithread

Z1 Extreme

i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
107.78k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
95.93k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
22.65k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
11.26k (x1)
TOTAL
553.41k
237.63k (x0.43)

Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
1184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
1054 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
2611 points/W

Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
6823 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
6048 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
1436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
17091 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4