| | | | | | |

Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Description
Both models Z1 Extreme and 7950X3D are based on Zen 4 architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the 7950X3D gets 1687.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 3.1 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
a60f12
Core
Phoenix
Raphael
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
BGA
AM5
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/32
TDP
30 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
131072 kB
Date
June 2023
February 2023
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
122.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
1687.86k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
41.61k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
31.34k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
16.95k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
33.08k (x1.21)
TOTAL
101.73k
122.98k (x1.21)

Multithread

Z1 Extreme

7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
647k (x2.73)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
533.47k (x2.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
279.07k (x2.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
228.31k (x20.24)
TOTAL
553.41k
1687.86k (x3.05)

Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
5392 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
4446 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
2326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
1903 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
14065 points/W

Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
7950X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
7300 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5499 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
2973 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
5803 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
21575 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4