Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.4 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 1.4 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
870f10
Core
Phoenix
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
30 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
June 2023
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
756.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
16.73k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
24.74k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
8.82k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
22.22k (x0.81)
TOTAL
101.73k
72.51k (x0.71)
Multithread
Z1 Extreme
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
248.24k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
309.66k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
140.01k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
58.39k (x5.18)
TOTAL
553.41k
756.3k (x1.37)
Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4