Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 5800X3D is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.1 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1.1 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
a20f12
Core
Phoenix
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
30 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
98304 kB
Date
June 2023
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
83.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
631.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
22.59k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
24.32k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
11.32k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
24.86k (x0.91)
TOTAL
101.73k
83.1k (x0.82)
Multithread
Z1 Extreme
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
181.41k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
236.12k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
105.13k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
108.48k (x9.62)
TOTAL
553.41k
631.14k (x1.14)
Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
1728 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
2249 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
1001 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
1033 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
6011 points/W
Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5405 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
5525 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
18467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4