| | | | | | |

Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Core i7-13700T


Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 1.7 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
b0671
Core
Phoenix
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
30 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
June 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
46.53k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
28.48k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
15.08k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
17.07k (x0.62)
TOTAL
101.73k
107.15k (x1.05)

Multithread

Z1 Extreme

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
443.98k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
343.34k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
147.61k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
16.36k (x1.45)
TOTAL
553.41k
951.3k (x1.72)

Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4