| | | | | | |

Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Core i3-13100F


Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.4 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
b06f5
Core
Phoenix
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
30 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
47.14k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
25.77k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
13.25k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
14.77k (x0.54)
TOTAL
101.73k
100.94k (x0.99)

Multithread

Z1 Extreme

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
168.51k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
142.8k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
63.57k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
15.34k (x1.36)
TOTAL
553.41k
390.23k (x0.71)

Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4