| | | | | | |

Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Core i7-12700H


Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.2 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
906a3
Core
Phoenix
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
30 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
June 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
93.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
643.29k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
41.64k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
25.48k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
13.2k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
12.8k (x0.47)
TOTAL
101.73k
93.12k (x0.92)

Multithread

Z1 Extreme

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
276.56k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
251.6k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
104.55k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
10.58k (x0.94)
TOTAL
553.41k
643.29k (x1.16)

Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
2188 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
5594 points/W

Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
8859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
2808 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
19813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4