| | | | | | |

Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Core i9-11900H


Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.1 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
806d1
Core
Phoenix
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
30 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
June 2023
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
584.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
33.38k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
27.12k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
11.69k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
17k (x0.62)
TOTAL
101.73k
89.19k (x0.88)

Multithread

Z1 Extreme

i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
249.83k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
237.26k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
84.18k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
13.2k (x1.17)
TOTAL
553.41k
584.47k (x1.06)

Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
12988 points/W

Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4