Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Core i7-11700
Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i7-11700 gets 729 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.3 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i7-11700 gets 729 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.3 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
a0671
Core
Phoenix
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
30 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
June 2023
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
98.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
728.98k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
35.12k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
29.24k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
12.56k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
21.95k (x0.8)
TOTAL
101.73k
98.87k (x0.97)
Multithread
Z1 Extreme
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
304k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
304.7k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
109.64k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
10.64k (x0.94)
TOTAL
553.41k
728.98k (x1.32)
Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
4677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
4688 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
11215 points/W
Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
7168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
2563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
20177 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4