Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The 7950X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2680 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2680 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
406f1
Core
Raphael
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
16/32
14/28
TDP
120 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
35840 kB
Date
February 2023
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
122.98k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
1687.86k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X3D
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
41.61k
17.8k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
31.34k
16.51k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
4.47k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.08k
2.56k (x0.08)
TOTAL
122.98k
41.35k (x0.34)
Multithread
7950X3D
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
647k
494.82k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
533.47k
514.13k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
279.07k
132.87k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
228.31k
20.8k (x0.09)
TOTAL
1687.86k
1162.63k (x0.69)
Performance/W
7950X3D
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5392 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4446 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2326 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1903 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
14065 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
7950X3D
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7300 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2973 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5803 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
21575 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4