| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
Both models 7950X3D and Z1 Extreme are based on Zen 4 architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 3.1 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a70f41
Core
Raphael
Phoenix
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
AM5
BGA
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
120 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2023
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
122.98k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
1687.86k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X3D
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
41.61k
32.74k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
31.34k
27.35k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
14.23k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.08k
27.41k (x0.83)
TOTAL
122.98k
101.73k (x0.83)

Multithread

7950X3D

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
647k
236.69k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
533.47k
202.63k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
279.07k
102.8k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
228.31k
11.28k (x0.05)
TOTAL
1687.86k
553.41k (x0.33)

Performance/W
7950X3D
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
5392 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4446 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2326 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1903 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
14065 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X3D
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
7300 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2973 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5803 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
21575 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4