Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 7950X
Description
Both models 7950X3D and 7950X are based on Zen 4 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the 7950X gets 1597.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1.1 times faster than the 7950X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the 7950X gets 1597.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1.1 times faster than the 7950X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a60f12
Core
Raphael
Raphael
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
AM5
AM5
Cores/Threads
16/32
16/32
TDP
120 W
170 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
131072 kB
Date
February 2023
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
122.98k points
121.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
1687.86k points
1597.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X3D
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
41.61k
40.61k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
31.34k
31.82k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
16.63k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.08k
32.28k (x0.98)
TOTAL
122.98k
121.33k (x0.99)
Multithread
7950X3D
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
647k
683.17k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
533.47k
563.45k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
279.07k
286.77k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
228.31k
64.4k (x0.28)
TOTAL
1687.86k
1597.79k (x0.95)
Performance/W
7950X3D
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5392 points/W
4019 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4446 points/W
3314 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2326 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1903 points/W
379 points/W
TOTAL
14065 points/W
9399 points/W
Performance/GHz
7950X3D
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
7300 points/GHz
7124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/GHz
5582 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2973 points/GHz
2917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5803 points/GHz
5663 points/GHz
TOTAL
21575 points/GHz
21286 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4