Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 7945HX
Description
Both models 7950X3D and 7945HX are based on Zen 4 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1.3 times faster than the 7945HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1.3 times faster than the 7945HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a60f12
Core
Raphael
Dragon Range
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
AM5
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
16/32
16/32
TDP
120 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
65536 kB
Date
February 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
122.98k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
1687.86k points
1313.94k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X3D
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
41.61k
37.43k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
31.34k
30.7k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
15.16k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.08k
29.78k (x0.9)
TOTAL
122.98k
113.07k (x0.92)
Multithread
7950X3D
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
647k
556.68k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
533.47k
482.32k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
279.07k
225.46k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
228.31k
49.48k (x0.22)
TOTAL
1687.86k
1313.94k (x0.78)
Performance/W
7950X3D
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5392 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4446 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2326 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1903 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
14065 points/W
23890 points/W
Performance/GHz
7950X3D
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
7300 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2973 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5803 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
21575 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4