Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 5900X
Description
The 7950X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 2 times faster than the 5900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 2 times faster than the 5900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a20f10
Core
Raphael
Vermeer
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM5
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/32
12/24
TDP
120 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
February 2023
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
122.98k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
1687.86k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X3D
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
41.61k
24.34k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
31.34k
26.8k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
12.12k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.08k
26.55k (x0.8)
TOTAL
122.98k
89.82k (x0.73)
Multithread
7950X3D
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
647k
263.12k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
533.47k
353.9k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
279.07k
159.07k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
228.31k
64.01k (x0.28)
TOTAL
1687.86k
840.11k (x0.5)
Performance/W
7950X3D
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5392 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4446 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2326 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1903 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
14065 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
7950X3D
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
7300 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2973 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5803 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
21575 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4