Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Description
Both models 7950X3D and 7800X3D are based on Zen 4 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1659.7 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 2.4 times faster than the 7800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1659.7 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 2.4 times faster than the 7800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a60f12
Core
Raphael
Raphael
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM5
AM5
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
120 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
98304 kB
Date
February 2023
April 2023
Mean monothread perf.
119.73k points
104.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
1659.74k points
704.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X3D
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
40.45k
36.77k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
30.77k
23.4k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.33k
14.8k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.18k
29.28k (x0.91)
TOTAL
119.73k
104.26k (x0.87)
Multithread
7950X3D
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
640.26k
249.4k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
525.94k
167.65k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
272.59k
104.85k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
220.96k
182.98k (x0.83)
TOTAL
1659.74k
704.89k (x0.42)
Performance/W
7950X3D
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
5335 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4383 points/W
1397 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2272 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1841 points/W
1525 points/W
TOTAL
13831 points/W
5874 points/W
Performance/GHz
7950X3D
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
7097 points/GHz
7354 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5399 points/GHz
4680 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2864 points/GHz
2961 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5645 points/GHz
5857 points/GHz
TOTAL
21005 points/GHz
20852 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4