| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core i7-13700T


Description
The 7950X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1.8 times faster than the i7-13700T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
b0671
Core
Raphael
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
16/24
TDP
120 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
30720 kB
Date
February 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
122.98k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
1687.86k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X3D
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
41.61k
46.53k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
31.34k
28.48k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
15.08k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.08k
17.07k (x0.52)
TOTAL
122.98k
107.15k (x0.87)

Multithread

7950X3D

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
647k
443.98k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
533.47k
343.34k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
279.07k
147.61k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
228.31k
16.36k (x0.07)
TOTAL
1687.86k
951.3k (x0.56)

Performance/W
7950X3D
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
5392 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4446 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2326 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1903 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
14065 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X3D
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
7300 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2973 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5803 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
21575 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4