| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core i7-13700K


Description
The 7950X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-13700K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the i7-13700K gets 1234.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 1.4 times faster than the i7-13700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
b0671
Core
Raphael
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
16/24
TDP
120 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x2048+2x4096 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
30720 kB
Date
February 2023
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
122.98k points
121.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
1687.86k points
1234.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X3D
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
41.61k
53.98k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
31.34k
31.5k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
16.52k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.08k
19.78k (x0.6)
TOTAL
122.98k
121.79k (x0.99)

Multithread

7950X3D

i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
647k
574.06k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
533.47k
435.61k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
279.07k
211.31k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
228.31k
13.69k (x0.06)
TOTAL
1687.86k
1234.67k (x0.73)

Performance/W
7950X3D
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
5392 points/W
4592 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4446 points/W
3485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2326 points/W
1690 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1903 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
14065 points/W
9877 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X3D
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
7300 points/GHz
9997 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/GHz
5834 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2973 points/GHz
3059 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5803 points/GHz
3664 points/GHz
TOTAL
21575 points/GHz
22553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4