| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core i5-13400


Description
The 7950X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 3.4 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
b06f2
Core
Raphael
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
10/16
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
20480 kB
Date
February 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
122.98k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
1687.86k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X3D
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
41.61k
47.01k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
31.34k
26.73k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
14.28k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.08k
12.1k (x0.37)
TOTAL
122.98k
100.11k (x0.81)

Multithread

7950X3D

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
647k
228.2k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
533.47k
160.28k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
279.07k
71.12k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
228.31k
38.23k (x0.17)
TOTAL
1687.86k
497.83k (x0.29)

Performance/W
7950X3D
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
5392 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4446 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2326 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1903 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
14065 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X3D
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
7300 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2973 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5803 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
21575 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4