| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core i7-1260P


Description
The 7950X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1687.9 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 4.3 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
906a3
Core
Raphael
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM5
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
16/32
12/16
TDP
120 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
18432 kB
Date
February 2023
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
122.98k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
1687.86k points
391.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X3D
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
41.61k
41.94k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
31.34k
26.81k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.95k
12.63k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.08k
13.51k (x0.41)
TOTAL
122.98k
94.9k (x0.77)

Multithread

7950X3D

i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
647k
168.12k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
533.47k
148.09k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
279.07k
60.28k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
228.31k
14.58k (x0.06)
TOTAL
1687.86k
391.07k (x0.23)

Performance/W
7950X3D
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
5392 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4446 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2326 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1903 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
14065 points/W
13967 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X3D
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
7300 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2973 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5803 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
21575 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4