Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 7950X3D is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1659.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 488 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 3.4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X3D gets a score of 1659.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 488 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X3D is 3.4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
90672
Core
Raphael
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
6/12
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
18432 kB
Date
February 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
119.73k points
87.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
1659.74k points
488.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X3D
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
40.45k
38.79k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
30.77k
23.73k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.33k
11.95k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.18k
13.41k (x0.42)
TOTAL
119.73k
87.88k (x0.73)
Multithread
7950X3D
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
640.26k
203.66k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
525.94k
182.98k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
272.59k
83.88k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
220.96k
17.49k (x0.08)
TOTAL
1659.74k
488.01k (x0.29)
Performance/W
7950X3D
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5335 points/W
3133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4383 points/W
2815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2272 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1841 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
13831 points/W
7508 points/W
Performance/GHz
7950X3D
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7097 points/GHz
8815 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5399 points/GHz
5394 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2864 points/GHz
2715 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5645 points/GHz
3048 points/GHz
TOTAL
21005 points/GHz
19972 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4