| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X vs Xeon E5-4640


Description
The 7950X is based on Zen 4 architecture while the E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1330.4 k points while the E5-4640 gets 610.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.2 times faster than the E5-4640 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
206d7
Core
Raphael
Sandy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
16/32
8 /16
TDP
170 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2022
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
121.33k points
13.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
1597.79k points
610.16k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
7950X
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
6.05k
1.66k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
23.41k
5.26k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.49k
2.13k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.35k
2.53k (x0.07)
TOTAL
80.3k
11.58k (x0.14)

Multithread

7950X

E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
128.82k
77.64k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
465.79k
212.2k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289.43k
113.11k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
75.23k
7.54k (x0.1)
TOTAL
959.27k
410.48k (x0.43)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7950X
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
26.86k
5.01k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
30.05k
4.5k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.15k
2.18k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
31.74k
2.19k (x0.07)
TOTAL
104.8k
13.88k (x0.13)

Multithread

7950X

E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
430.6k
251.29k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
545.91k
236.61k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289.57k
114.89k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.33k
7.36k (x0.11)
TOTAL
1330.41k
610.16k (x0.46)

Performance/W
7950X
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
2533 points/W
2645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3211 points/W
2491 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1703 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
378 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
7826 points/W
6423 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
4712 points/GHz
1790 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/GHz
1609 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2834 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5569 points/GHz
782 points/GHz
TOTAL
18386 points/GHz
4957 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4