| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The 7950X is based on Zen 4 architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1330.4 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.1 times faster than the E5-2697 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
306e4
Core
Raphael
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
16/32
12 /24
TDP
170 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2022
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
121.33k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
1597.79k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
7950X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
6.05k
3.44k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.41k
9.54k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.49k
4.21k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.35k
3.94k (x0.11)
TOTAL
80.3k
21.13k (x0.26)

Multithread

7950X

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
128.82k
73.17k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
465.79k
230.83k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289.43k
107.14k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
75.23k
7.99k (x0.11)
TOTAL
959.27k
419.12k (x0.44)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7950X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
26.86k
10.53k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
30.05k
9.98k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.15k
4k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
31.74k
3.4k (x0.11)
TOTAL
104.8k
27.92k (x0.27)

Multithread

7950X

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
430.6k
247.05k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
545.91k
264.43k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289.57k
111.01k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.33k
10.66k (x0.17)
TOTAL
1330.41k
633.14k (x0.48)

Performance/W
7950X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2533 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3211 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1703 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
378 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
7826 points/W
4870 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4712 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2834 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5569 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
18386 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4