Ryzen 9 7950X vs Core i9-10900KF
Description
The 7950X is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X is 1.9 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X is 1.9 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a0655
Core
Raphael
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
16/32
10/20
TDP
170 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
121.33k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
1597.79k points
825.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
40.61k
35.87k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
31.82k
31.43k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.63k
7.34k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.28k
15.73k (x0.49)
TOTAL
121.33k
90.37k (x0.74)
Multithread
7950X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
683.17k
377.56k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
563.45k
347.59k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
286.77k
88.08k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.4k
12.24k (x0.19)
TOTAL
1597.79k
825.47k (x0.52)
Performance/W
7950X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4019 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3314 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
379 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
9399 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
7950X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
7124 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5582 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2917 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5663 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
21286 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4