Ryzen 9 7950X vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Description
Both models 7950X and Z1 Extreme are based on Zen 4 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.9 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.9 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a70f41
Core
Raphael
Phoenix
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
AM5
BGA
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
170 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2022
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
121.33k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
1597.79k points
553.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
40.61k
32.74k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
31.82k
27.35k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.63k
14.23k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.28k
27.41k (x0.85)
TOTAL
121.33k
101.73k (x0.84)
Multithread
7950X
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
683.17k
236.69k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
563.45k
202.63k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
286.77k
102.8k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.4k
11.28k (x0.18)
TOTAL
1597.79k
553.41k (x0.35)
Performance/W
7950X
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
4019 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3314 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
379 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
9399 points/W
18447 points/W
Performance/GHz
7950X
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
7124 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5582 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2917 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5663 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
21286 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4