| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X vs 7945HX


Description
Both models 7950X and 7945HX are based on Zen 4 architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 1.2 times faster than the 7945HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a60f12
Core
Raphael
Dragon Range
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
AM5
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
16/32
16/32
TDP
170 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
65536 kB
Date
September 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
121.33k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
1597.79k points
1313.94k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
40.61k
37.43k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
31.82k
30.7k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.63k
15.16k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.28k
29.78k (x0.92)
TOTAL
121.33k
113.07k (x0.93)

Multithread

7950X

7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
683.17k
556.68k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
563.45k
482.32k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
286.77k
225.46k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.4k
49.48k (x0.77)
TOTAL
1597.79k
1313.94k (x0.82)

Performance/W
7950X
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4019 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3314 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
379 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
9399 points/W
23890 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
7124 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5582 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2917 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5663 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
21286 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4