| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D


Description
Both models 7950X and 7800X3D are based on Zen 4 architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.3 times faster than the 7800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a60f12
Core
Raphael
Raphael
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM5
AM5
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
170 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
98304 kB
Date
September 2022
April 2023
Mean monothread perf.
121.33k points
104.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
1597.79k points
704.89k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
40.61k
36.77k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
31.82k
23.4k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.63k
14.8k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.28k
29.28k (x0.91)
TOTAL
121.33k
104.26k (x0.86)

Multithread

7950X

7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
683.17k
249.4k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
563.45k
167.65k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
286.77k
104.85k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.4k
182.98k (x2.84)
TOTAL
1597.79k
704.89k (x0.44)

Performance/W
7950X
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
4019 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3314 points/W
1397 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
379 points/W
1525 points/W
TOTAL
9399 points/W
5874 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
7124 points/GHz
7354 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5582 points/GHz
4680 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2917 points/GHz
2961 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5663 points/GHz
5857 points/GHz
TOTAL
21286 points/GHz
20852 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4