| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X vs Core i9-13900KF


Description
The 7950X is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 1 times faster than the 7950X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
b0671
Core
Raphael
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
24/32
TDP
170 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
36864 kB
Date
September 2022
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
121.33k points
128.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
1597.79k points
1660.01k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
40.61k
61.1k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
31.82k
31.23k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.63k
17.57k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.28k
18.89k (x0.59)
TOTAL
121.33k
128.79k (x1.06)

Multithread

7950X

i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
683.17k
767.22k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
563.45k
576.38k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
286.77k
284.31k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.4k
32.09k (x0.5)
TOTAL
1597.79k
1660.01k (x1.04)

Performance/W
7950X
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4019 points/W
6138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3314 points/W
4611 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
2274 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
379 points/W
257 points/W
TOTAL
9399 points/W
13280 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
7124 points/GHz
10535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5582 points/GHz
5384 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2917 points/GHz
3030 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5663 points/GHz
3257 points/GHz
TOTAL
21286 points/GHz
22206 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4