| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X vs Core i5-12400F


Description
The 7950X is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 4 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
90675
Core
Raphael
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
6/12
TDP
170 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
121.33k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
1597.79k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
7950X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6.05k
7.43k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
23.41k
18.64k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.49k
13.15k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.35k
14.82k (x0.43)
TOTAL
80.3k
54.04k (x0.67)

Multithread

7950X

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
128.82k
36.23k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
465.79k
134.76k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289.43k
84.06k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
75.23k
16.71k (x0.22)
TOTAL
959.27k
271.76k (x0.28)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7950X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
26.86k
24.24k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
30.05k
24.74k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.15k
13.95k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
31.74k
14.47k (x0.46)
TOTAL
104.8k
77.41k (x0.74)

Multithread

7950X

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
430.6k
126.87k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
545.91k
186.48k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289.57k
92.37k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.33k
15.45k (x0.24)
TOTAL
1330.41k
421.18k (x0.32)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
40.61k
33.85k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
31.82k
20.33k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.63k
10.51k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.28k
11.77k (x0.36)
TOTAL
121.33k
76.46k (x0.63)

Multithread

7950X

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
683.17k
174.21k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
563.45k
141.31k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
286.77k
64.86k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.4k
19.01k (x0.3)
TOTAL
1597.79k
399.39k (x0.25)

Performance/W
7950X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4019 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3314 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
379 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
9399 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7124 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5582 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2917 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5663 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
21286 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4