| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7950X vs Core i5-12400


Description
The 7950X is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.9 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
90672
Core
Raphael
Arder Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
6/12
TDP
170 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
121.33k points
102.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
1597.79k points
544.64k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
7950X
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
6.05k
7.51k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
23.41k
18.66k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.49k
13.32k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
34.35k
14.8k (x0.43)
TOTAL
80.3k
54.29k (x0.68)

Multithread

7950X

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
128.82k
35.52k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
465.79k
138.43k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289.43k
85.55k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
75.23k
21.72k (x0.29)
TOTAL
959.27k
281.22k (x0.29)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7950X
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
26.86k
23.84k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
30.05k
25.09k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.15k
14.1k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
31.74k
14.48k (x0.46)
TOTAL
104.8k
77.51k (x0.74)

Multithread

7950X

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
430.6k
123.98k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
545.91k
176.89k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289.57k
97.42k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.33k
20.78k (x0.32)
TOTAL
1330.41k
419.07k (x0.31)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
40.61k
48.08k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
31.82k
25.6k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.63k
14.02k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.28k
14.81k (x0.46)
TOTAL
121.33k
102.51k (x0.84)

Multithread

7950X

i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
683.17k
230.14k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
563.45k
198.07k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
286.77k
94.78k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.4k
21.64k (x0.34)
TOTAL
1597.79k
544.64k (x0.34)

Performance/W
7950X
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
4019 points/W
3541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3314 points/W
3047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
1458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
379 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
9399 points/W
8379 points/W

Performance/GHz
7950X
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
7124 points/GHz
10927 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5582 points/GHz
5819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2917 points/GHz
3186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5663 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
TOTAL
21286 points/GHz
23298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4