Ryzen 9 7950X vs Core i3-12100F
Description
The 7950X is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X is 4.7 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7950X gets a score of 1597.8 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7950X is 4.7 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
90675
Core
Raphael
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
4/8
TDP
170 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
131072 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
121.33k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
1597.79k points
340.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7950X
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
40.61k
39.54k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
31.82k
23.79k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.63k
11.96k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.28k
13.52k (x0.42)
TOTAL
121.33k
88.81k (x0.73)
Multithread
7950X
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
683.17k
148k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
563.45k
123.08k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
286.77k
52.73k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
64.4k
16.67k (x0.26)
TOTAL
1597.79k
340.49k (x0.21)
Performance/W
7950X
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
4019 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3314 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
379 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
9399 points/W
5871 points/W
Performance/GHz
7950X
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
7124 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5582 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2917 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5663 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
21286 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4