Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Xeon E5-2690 v3
Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the E5-2690 v3 gets 1016.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
306f2
Core
Dragon Range
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
16/32
12/24
TDP
55 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
40.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
1016.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
20.96k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
11.74k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
4.61k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
3.4k (x0.11)
TOTAL
113.07k
40.71k (x0.36)
Multithread
7945HX
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
531.68k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
342.28k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
133.22k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
9.19k (x0.19)
TOTAL
1313.94k
1016.36k (x0.77)
Performance/W
7945HX
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
3938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
2535 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
7529 points/W
Performance/GHz
7945HX
E5-2690 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
5988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
3356 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
1318 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
11632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4