Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2680 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2680 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
406f1
Core
Dragon Range
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
16/32
14/28
TDP
55 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
35840 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
17.8k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
16.51k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
4.47k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
2.56k (x0.09)
TOTAL
113.07k
41.35k (x0.37)
Multithread
7945HX
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
494.82k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
514.13k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
132.87k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
20.8k (x0.42)
TOTAL
1313.94k
1162.63k (x0.88)
Performance/W
7945HX
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
7945HX
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4