| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Core i9-10940X


Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the i9-10940X gets 1088.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.2 times faster than the i9-10940X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
50657
Core
Dragon Range
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
16/32
14/28
TDP
55 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
14x1024 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
19712 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
72.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
1088.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
29.75k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
27.44k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
5.81k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
9.05k (x0.3)
TOTAL
113.07k
72.04k (x0.64)

Multithread

7945HX

i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
485.37k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
472.7k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
113.09k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
16.95k (x0.34)
TOTAL
1313.94k
1088.11k (x0.83)

Performance/W
7945HX
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
2942 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
2865 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
685 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
6595 points/W

Performance/GHz
7945HX
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
6197 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
5717 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
1210 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
15009 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4