Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Core i9-10900KF
Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.6 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.6 times faster than the i9-10900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a0655
Core
Dragon Range
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
16/32
10/20
TDP
55 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
825.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
35.87k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
31.43k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
7.34k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
15.73k (x0.53)
TOTAL
113.07k
90.37k (x0.8)
Multithread
7945HX
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
377.56k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
347.59k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
88.08k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
12.24k (x0.25)
TOTAL
1313.94k
825.47k (x0.63)
Performance/W
7945HX
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
7945HX
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4