| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
Both models 7945HX and Z1 Extreme are based on Zen 4 architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 2.4 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a70f41
Core
Dragon Range
Phoenix
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
BGA
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
55 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
32.74k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
27.35k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
14.23k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
27.41k (x0.92)
TOTAL
113.07k
101.73k (x0.9)

Multithread

7945HX

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
236.69k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
202.63k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
102.8k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
11.28k (x0.23)
TOTAL
1313.94k
553.41k (x0.42)

Performance/W
7945HX
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
7945HX
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4