| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Ryzen 5 5600X


Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 3 times faster than the 5600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a20f10
Core
Dragon Range
Vermeer
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/32
6/12
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2023
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
86.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
435.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
23.28k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
25.58k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
11.72k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
25.45k (x0.85)
TOTAL
113.07k
86.03k (x0.76)

Multithread

7945HX

5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
135.28k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
180.56k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
80.27k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
38.94k (x0.79)
TOTAL
1313.94k
435.05k (x0.33)

Performance/W
7945HX
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
599 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
6693 points/W

Performance/GHz
7945HX
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
5061 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
2548 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
5533 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
18702 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4