| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Ryzen 5 5600


Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 3.1 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
a20f12
Core
Dragon Range
Vermeer
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
AM4
Cores/Threads
16/32
6/12
TDP
55 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
429.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
22.73k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
24.59k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
11.44k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
25.03k (x0.84)
TOTAL
113.07k
83.79k (x0.74)

Multithread

7945HX

5600
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
134.28k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
178.56k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
78.16k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
38.26k (x0.77)
TOTAL
1313.94k
429.25k (x0.33)

Performance/W
7945HX
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
7945HX
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4