| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Core i9-13900KF


Description
The 7945HX is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7945HX gets a score of 1313.9 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 1.3 times faster than the 7945HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a60f12
b0671
Core
Dragon Range
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.4 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FL1
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
24/32
TDP
55 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
16x1024 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
65536 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
113.07k points
128.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
1313.94k points
1660.01k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7945HX
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
61.1k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
30.7k
31.23k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.16k
17.57k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.78k
18.89k (x0.63)
TOTAL
113.07k
128.79k (x1.14)

Multithread

7945HX

i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
556.68k
767.22k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
482.32k
576.38k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225.46k
284.31k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
49.48k
32.09k (x0.65)
TOTAL
1313.94k
1660.01k (x1.26)

Performance/W
7945HX
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
10121 points/W
6138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8770 points/W
4611 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4099 points/W
2274 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points/W
257 points/W
TOTAL
23890 points/W
13280 points/W

Performance/GHz
7945HX
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
6932 points/GHz
10535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5685 points/GHz
5384 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2807 points/GHz
3030 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5515 points/GHz
3257 points/GHz
TOTAL
20939 points/GHz
22206 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4